Judge blocks Trump from deporting Guatemalan migrant children

WASHINGTON (AP):

A federal judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from immediately deporting Guatemalan migrant children who came to the US alone back to their home country, the latest step in a court struggle over one of the most sensitive issues in Trump’s hard-line immigration agenda.

The decision by US District Judge Timothy J. Kelly comes after the Republican administration’s Labour Day weekend attempt to remove Guatemalan migrant children who were living in government shelters and foster care.

Trump administration officials said they were seeking to reunify children with parents who wanted them returned home. “But that explanation crumbled like a house of cards about a week later,” Kelly, who was nominated by Trump, wrote. “There is no evidence before the court that the parents of these children sought their return.”

Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin in a statement insisted on the administration’s initial claims that parents requested being reunited with their children.

“This judge is blocking efforts to reunify children with their families. Now these children will have to go to shelters,” McLaughlin said. “All just to ‘get Trump’. This is disgraceful and immoral.”

A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advocates for the children also submitted a whistleblower account to the court that suggests many of the children who were found eligible for deportation had likely been victims of child abuse, like death threats, gang violence, and human trafficking, Kelly noted in his order.

“The court saw through the government’s repeated misrepresentations of critical facts to try to justify the indefensible targeting of vulnerable children who would have faced danger if forcibly sent to other countries,” Efrén C. Olivares, vice president of litigation and legal strategy at the National Immigration Law Center, said in a statement.

There was already a temporary order in place preventing the removal of Guatemalan children. But that was set to expire Tuesday. Kelly granted a preliminary injunction extends that temporary protection indefinitely, although the government can appeal.

UNLAWFUL REMOVAL

Kelly did rebuff advocates’ push to block the removal of children from additional countries, though he said any attempt to remove those children in a similar way would likely be unlawful. Legal advocates working with Kids in Need of Defense visited Honduras last week and found government officials and nongovernmental organisations working “furiously” to receive as many as 400 children back from the United States.

There are also temporary restraining orders in separate cases in Arizona and Illinois, but those cases are much more narrow in the scope of children they cover, underlining the importance of the Washington case.

In a late-night operation on August 30, the administration notified shelters where migrant children travelling alone initially live after they cross the US-Mexico border that they would be returning the children to Guatemala and that they needed to have the kids ready to leave in a matter of hours.

“Our clients were terrified – many had tear-soaked faces and some were visibly shaking with fear,” Mishan Wroe, directing attorney at the National Center for Youth Law, one of the plaintiff attorneys, said in a statement.

Contractors for Immigration and Customs Enforcement picked up the Guatemalan children from shelters and foster care and transported them to the airport. The government has said in court filings that it identified 457 children for possible removal to Guatemala although that list was eventually whittled down to 327. In the end, 76 got as far as boarding planes in El Paso and Harlingen, Texas, on August 31, and were set to depart to Guatemala in what the government described as a first phase.

Bertilda López’s 17-year-old son was among those slated to be sent to Guatemala. Over Labour Day weekend, he called his family late at night to tell them he was being sent home and she drove through the night to get to the capital.

She expressed mixed feelings about the judge’s decision Thursday.

“As a mother I want him to be well, whether that’s sending him (home) or him being locked up there,” López said. “Maybe it’s better that they send him back because he’s really sad. The way things are there (in the US), it bothers me that my son is locked up.”

Elisabeth Toca, who is sponsoring the boy and hopeful he will be allowed to stay, said she’s still hoping she will be able to get him out of US custody and “give him a better life”.

Guatemala’s government declined to comment, saying only that it was an internal US justice process.

Immigration and children’s advocates, who had been alerted of possible efforts to remove Guatemalan minors, immediately sued the Trump administration to prevent the children’s removal. The advocates argued that many of these children were fleeing abuse or violence in their home countries and that the government was bypassing longstanding legal procedures meant to protect young migrants from being returned to potentially abusive or violent places.

“This was a tragedy in the making that was barely averted thanks to the tireless efforts of advocates across the country who saw that children were being endangered and raised the alarm,” Shaina Aber, executive director of the Acacia Center for Justice, said in a statement.